Mid Suffolk District Council
Tenant Satisfaction Measures 2025/26
CouncilSouth3,507 homesRegulator code 42UE
In 2025/26, 70.8% of Mid Suffolk District Council's tenants in rented homes were satisfied overall with its service (TP01). That is above the median of 70.6% for councils, putting it in the second quartile (79th of 160).
That is up 4.8 points on 2024/25. Against other councils, its strongest result was communal areas and its most room to improve was time taken for repairs.
Compare Mid Suffolk District Council with its peers
Peers by size, region or patch, three-year trends, a what-if tool and a printable report, in the TSM Tracker.
Tenant perception, rented homes
| Measure | 2025/26 | Median for councils | Quartile | Since 2024/25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP01Overall satisfaction | 70.8% | 70.6% | 2nd | ▲ +4.8 |
| TP02Satisfaction with repairs | 72.5% | 74.4% | 3rd | ▲ +7.3 |
| TP03Time taken for repairs | 65.7% | 71.3% | 3rd | ▲ +13.0 |
| TP04Well-maintained home | 72.5% | 71.4% | 2nd | ▲ +5.6 |
| TP05Safe home | 79.3% | 76.8% | 2nd | ▲ +2.4 |
| TP06Listens and acts | 57.9% | 60.2% | 3rd | ▲ +3.2 |
| TP07Keeps tenants informed | 73.5% | 71.4% | 2nd | ▲ +5.1 |
| TP08Fair and respectful | 76.6% | 77.0% | 3rd | ▲ +2.8 |
| TP09Complaints handling | 31.9% | 32.3% | 3rd | ▼ −2.9 |
| TP10Communal areas | 80.4% | 66.2% | Top | ▲ +12.2 |
| TP11Neighbourhood contribution | 61.0% | 64.2% | 3rd | ▲ +5.3 |
| TP12Anti-social behaviour | 60.8% | 57.6% | 2nd | ▲ +4.0 |
Repairs & building safety
| Measure | 2025/26 | Median for councils | Quartile | Since 2024/25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RP01Homes failing Decent Homes (lower is better) | 10.4% | 3.6% | Bottom | ▼ −5.0 |
| RP02_1Non-emergency repairs on time | 82.5% | 85.7% | 3rd | ▲ +36.0 |
| RP02_2Emergency repairs on time | 91.1% | 95.2% | Bottom | ▲ +19.0 |
| BS01Gas safety checks | 100.0% | 99.9% | Top | ▲ +0.4 |
| BS02Fire risk assessments | 100.0% | 100.0% | 2nd | 0.0 |
| BS03Asbestos surveys | 100.0% | 100.0% | 2nd | 0.0 |
| BS04Legionella assessments | 100.0% | 100.0% | 2nd | 0.0 |
| BS05Lift safety checks | 100.0% | 100.0% | 2nd | 0.0 |
Complaints & neighbourhood
| Measure | 2025/26 | Median for councils | Quartile | Since 2024/25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH01_1Stage 1 complaints rate (lower is better) | 71.9 per 1,000 homes | 51.8 | Bottom | ▼ −5.30 |
| CH01_2Stage 2 complaints rate (lower is better) | 9.10 per 1,000 homes | 10.8 | 2nd | ▼ −1.50 |
| CH02_1Stage 1 responded in time | 88.5% | 88.0% | 2nd | ▲ +32.2 |
| CH02_2Stage 2 responded in time | 96.8% | 86.3% | 2nd | ▲ +7.9 |
| NM01_1ASB cases rate (lower is better) | 30.5 per 1,000 homes | 37.3 | 2nd | ▼ −11.3 |
| NM01_2Hate incident cases rate (lower is better) | 0.30 per 1,000 homes | 0.60 | 2nd | ▼ −1.40 |
Quartiles and medians compare Mid Suffolk District Council with the councils that published each measure for rented homes.
The 2025/26 tenant survey was run by telephone, 622 responses, margin of error ±3.5 points.
Other councils in South
Contains public sector information published by the Regulator of Social Housing, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Map boundaries: ONS Open Geography Portal, Crown copyright and database right, OGL v3.0. Analysis by CX-Feedback.